Perpetuum mobile

A real­ity with­out abil­ity to embrace extremes wouldn’t be a real­ity — it would col­lapse because of inner imper­fec­tion. Our the­o­ries may col­lapse because our rea­son­ing based on prej­u­dices and lim­ited obser­va­tion is imper­fect and inad­e­quate, but we can­not say the world col­lapses because of that.

Paragraph

As we exam­ine human his­tory we see the nature pro­duc­ing won­der­ful new answers and oppor­tu­ni­ties in extreme con­di­tions. Pos­si­bly for a moment we see cer­tain behav­iors as extremes, but they inevitably bring for­ward reac­tions which cre­ate new pos­si­bil­i­ties and realms of exis­tence. Today’s extremes are tomorrow’s yesterday’s news. In lan­guage of con­tem­po­rary physics, we can­not say extremes we see are indeed the out­most stretch of the objec­tive real­ity, but they’re part of our sub­jec­tive real­ity. But even as such real­ity seems to be all accom­mo­dat­ing and shifts itself the very next moment to embrace changes caused by extrem­i­ties. It some­how finds a per­fect solu­tion, or a rem­edy, that in turn cre­ates new level of exis­tence and understanding.

That is, in essence, how the prin­ci­ple of dual­ism(1) works, and that’s how we gather knowl­edge of the world and its pos­si­bil­i­ties. Dual­ism is thus both the mean and the way of exis­tence. It helps us gather bet­ter knowl­edge and under­stand­ing of our own poten­tial. It’s in the nature, and in the nature of self.

Some­thing pro­found is hid­den in this prin­ci­ple. It will help us under­stand some old insights in a new light and demys­tify them. There’s an old para­ble: one has become many. It comes from the old scrip­tures and wants to illus­trate an idea of how God cre­ated cos­mos and beings like us. But it doesn’t explain why exactly. We’re left with only some reli­gious and pre-rational assump­tions about it that don’t con­vince any­more. Today we may ask right­fully: what’s wrong in being just one?

If we observe the pic­ture from our new per­spec­tive, the answer is imma­nent: to expe­ri­ence how far one can go and what are the lim­its of its own poten­tial. To illus­trate it visu­ally, one has cre­ated numer­ous mir­rors to observe its own exis­tence from var­i­ous angles. What is such an exis­tence capa­ble of? A true poten­tial of such a real­ity can­not be realised and released oth­er­wise but through numer­ous mir­rors, or wit­nesses of one’s exis­tence. No observers, no reality.

Our life’s expe­ri­ence tells we always need some­thing or some­one to reflect onto, to reflect upon, to observe our­selves and the out­reach of our exis­tence. For exam­ple, we need friends to see how capa­ble friends we are. We need chil­dren to see how good par­ents we are. Once we reach some­thing, we see some­thing new com­ing again, one more rea­son to live the moment. It’s the only and true per­petuum mobile.(2) It’s not only pre­serv­ing the momen­tum (which would mean it doesn’t lose its energy), but along with inevitable fric­tion (in the form of every­thing out­dated and obso­lete) it con­stantly cre­ates new poten­tial. An out­side observer would per­ceive it as a per­fect state of bal­ance. How­ever, from the inside, an observer would expe­ri­ence a con­stant flux and motion.

Let’s stop for a moment now. Can we indeed per­ceive such a real­ity from out­side and observe its bal­ance? No, we can­not. We’re already sub­merged into real­ity and the bal­ance we eagerly strive for in our lives must be achieved through its flux and motion — through the cycle of per­petuum mobile — and not through the state of immo­bil­ity and inac­tiv­ity. As con­tem­po­rary physics sug­gests, even immo­bil­ity and inac­tion is already an action because we can­not sep­a­rate our­selves from the envi­ron­ment. When we observe, we already par­tic­i­pate in and change reality.

Per­petuum mobile of the one and self doesn’t deplete its own resources through the feed­back loop and doesn’t stop after some time. It always gives birth to some­thing new. Its pri­mary nature is to exist and from that every­thing else arises.

____
(1) Dual­ism: the divi­sion of some­thing con­cep­tu­ally into two opposed or con­trasted aspects, or the state of being so divided.
(2) Per­petuum mobile, or per­pet­ual motion: a state in which move­ment or action is or appears to be con­tin­u­ous and unceasing.

— Zvon­imir Tosic


Leave a Reply