A Contradiction

In The Bha­ga­vat, Its Phi­los­o­phy, Ethics and The­ol­ogy, Bhak­tivin­ode Thakur says, “Lib­erty then is the prin­ci­ple, which we must con­sider as the most valu­able gift of God. We must not allow our­selves to be led by those who lived and thought before us. We must think for our­selves and try to get fur­ther truths which are still undis­cov­ered. In the Bha­ga­vat we have been advised to take the spirit of the shas­tras and not the words. The Bha­ga­vat is, there­fore, a reli­gion of lib­erty, unmixed truth, and absolute love.”

This is how I prac­tice my faith. Bhak­tivin­ode was a 19th cen­tury, British edu­cated mag­is­trate. He was trained to hear the tes­ti­mony, view the evi­dence and draw a con­clu­sion as to what the truth of the mat­ter is. He approached spir­i­tual truth in the same way, study­ing var­i­ous reli­gions and philoso­phies, both East­ern and West­ern. He con­cluded the teach­ings of the Bha­ga­vat were the best, but he also found errors in it and the writ­ings of its most revered com­men­ta­tors. He trusted him­self, his intel­li­gence and nat­ural intu­ition to guide him. He some­times broke with tra­di­tion and took con­tro­ver­sial stands.

Yet, A.C. Bhak­tivedanta Swami and his fol­low­ers claim to be in Bhaktivinode’s dis­ci­plic suc­ces­sion, but they claim to present an absolute, unadul­ter­ated, divinely revealed truth that has been handed down from the begin­ning of time through this dis­ci­plic suc­ces­sion and it can never be changed or ques­tioned. How is this possible?


Leave a Reply