Here I stand

In the early 1970s, I lived in India for three years as a renounced devo­tee of Radha Krishna liv­ing in the holy places such as Vrind­a­ban. I got to expe­ri­ence this spir­i­tual path in its home­land from a vari­ety of rep­utable sources, most impor­tantly Dr. O.B.L. Kapoor and Lalita Prasad Thakur. I became very Indi­an­ized and an ini­ti­ate into the most advanced spir­i­tual tra­di­tions among fol­low­ers of Sri Chaitanya.

I resumed my Amer­i­can beat/hippie lifestyle in 1974, got involved with the New Age Move­ment, Sufism, Tao­ism, Zen, etc. while con­tin­u­ing my devo­tion to Radha Krishna inter­nally. Then, I got involved with the United Church of Christ so much so that I went to sem­i­nary, got ordained and served as a Mid-west church pas­tor for eleven years, all the while main­tain­ing an inner devo­tion to Radha Krishna from the per­spec­tive that Love is the eter­nal reli­gion of all and just man­i­fested dif­fer­ently through Jesus and Chai­tanya. Thus, I was very much re-Americanized, and my sem­i­nary edu­ca­tion gave me new intel­lec­tual tools with which to re-examine the writ­ings of Sri Chaitanya’s fol­low­ers and the beliefs I for­merly held.

Since leav­ing the church in 2002, I have returned to Radha Krishna devo­tion as my pri­mary spir­i­tual prac­tice both inter­nally and exter­nally. How­ever, I have def­i­nitely devel­oped my own devo­tional style based on my cross-cultural, inter­faith back­ground. Thus, the Uni­ver­sal­ist Church of Radha Krishna is my own per­sonal take on spir­i­tu­al­ity based on a wish by Bhak­tivin­ode Thakur that Radha Krishna devo­tion be indi­g­e­nized in the West. To do this, I have even had to break with the Thakur and other pre­vi­ous teach­ers where I felt the teach­ings were not rel­e­vant or not core essen­tial teachings.

I take full respon­si­bil­ity, with the help of the many teach­ers of all faiths I encoun­tered along the way, for who I am and my teach­ings. Mak­ing an ancient, for­eign reli­gion rel­e­vant to a new time and set­ting requires rad­i­cal depar­tures from the past which I sup­pose entails a degree of auda­cious­ness that few seem to pos­sess. So, here I stand.


Leave a Reply