God As Mother 2

I fin­ished read­ing God As Mother: A Fem­i­nine The­ol­ogy in India, by Cheever Macken­zie Brown. I am 124 pages into the Brah­mavaivarta Purana (BVP) which is 1500 pages.

While there is still anti-feminine rhetoric in the BVP due to the strong patri­ar­chal, ascetic, renun­ci­ate strain in Vedic the­ol­ogy which sees the fem­i­nine as the seduc­tress who binds us to illu­sory mate­r­ial nature which is also fem­i­nine. Yet the counter argu­ment is also made eulo­giz­ing the virtues of a chaste wife. Radha and Krishna have cos­mogo­nic and sote­ri­o­log­i­cal equal­ity and Radha is con­sid­ered even more mer­ci­ful than Krishna. Krishna how­ever retains onto­log­i­cal supe­ri­or­ity. The Devi Bha­ga­vat Purana is an even more extreme, later fem­i­nist writ­ing which also gives the God­dess onto­log­i­cal superiority.

In the BVP, Radha and Krishna are the divine God and God­dess who cre­ated the uni­verse by their cop­u­la­tion. They are clearly mar­ried by Brahma from the begin­ning of their rela­tion­ship in their earthly pas­times. “Radha as the Divine Fem­i­nine is man­i­fest in all female beings and Krishna in all male beings. Here the rela­tion­ship of the supreme pair again directly affects man’s devo­tional atti­tudes and con­duct.” (Brown, p 202) We are cre­ated as their parts and in their image. As par­ents of all, they are our role mod­els. “The Chai­tanya school in its early period, it seems, also favored the svakiya (mar­ried) ideal. This is the view, appar­ently, of the two great Goswamins, Rupa and Jiva.” (Ibid., pp 203–4)

Most fol­low­ers of Chai­tanya rely on the Bha­ga­vat Purana. See­ing the dif­fer­ences in the way var­i­ous Puranas por­tray the same sub­ject mat­ter gives us per­mis­sion to have dif­fer­ent views also. See­ing how the Puranas and other Vedic lit­er­a­tures evolved over time gives us per­mis­sion to con­tinue evolv­ing them. In India, there are numer­ous forms of Radha Krishna devo­tion. Unfor­tu­nately, it seems most West­ern devo­tees of Radha Krishna are of a lit­er­al­ist, fun­da­men­tal­ist bent and not open to the changes needed to develop an indige­nous Radha Krishna wor­ship as Bhak­tivin­ode Thakur desired.


Leave a Reply